Medical coding practice
Learn coding by coding, not by answering questions about coding.
Students work real clinical documentation: read the chart, highlight what matters, search the code set, sequence the diagnoses, submit. Every mistake comes back with the reason and the guideline behind it.
ICD-10-CM and HCPCS Level II · fictional cases reviewed by credentialed coders
E11.9 states the diabetes is without complications, which the documentation contradicts. The provider records an A1c of 9.4% with fasting glucose of 248 mg/dL and explicitly assesses hyperglycemia.
I.A.19I10 is only correct when hypertension exists without kidney involvement. This patient has both, and ICD-10-CM presumes a causal relationship.
I.C.9.a.2One loop, done properly
Trainers assign cases. Students code them. The system evaluates and explains. The trainer reviews every submission before the result is released.
- 01
Assign
Build an assignment from the case library, set the rules, publish to a batch.
- 02
Code
Students read the chart in a three-pane workspace, search codes and sequence them.
- 03
Explain
Automatic evaluation returns per-code findings with rationale and guideline citation.
- 04
Review
The trainer checks every submission, can override any finding, then releases it.
Students
Build a coding profile, not a grade
- Accuracy by specialty and by error type
- Sequencing, laterality and specificity tracked separately
- Practice library outside assignments
Trainers
See who is struggling, and with what
- Batch accuracy and assignment completion
- Most-missed codes across the cohort
- Review queue with score override
Institutions
Run cohorts without spreadsheets
- Batches, bulk student import, seat tracking
- Trainer and student management
- Audit trail on every change
